Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with GPT-4o-mini and Laguna XS 2.1, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

GPT-4o-mini vs Laguna XS 2.1

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of GPT-4o-mini and Laguna XS 2.1
Field
ModelCap position#216#213
Index score1.13.0
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsEstimatedplaced against measured peers on publisher-reported benchmarks, discounted for self-report optimism
Input / 1M$0.15$0.06
Output / 1M$0.60$0.12
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context128K262K
Providers21
Weight accessAPI onlyRestricted license

Decision facts

  • GPT-4o-mini is #216; Laguna XS 2.1 is #213 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 1.1 for GPT-4o-mini and 3.0 for Laguna XS 2.1.
  • Evidence differs: GPT-4o-mini is Measured; Laguna XS 2.1 is Estimated.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.60 for GPT-4o-mini and $0.12 for Laguna XS 2.1.
  • Published context is 128,000 tokens for GPT-4o-mini and 262,144 for Laguna XS 2.1.
  • Weight access differs: GPT-4o-mini is none; Laguna XS 2.1 is restricted.
  • ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for GPT-4o-mini and 1 for Laguna XS 2.1.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.