Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with GPT-4o-mini and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

GPT-4o-mini vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of GPT-4o-mini and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Field
ModelCap position#216#64
Index score1.141.5
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M$0.15$0.25
Output / 1M$0.60$2.00
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context128K400K
Providers21
Weight accessAPI onlyAPI only

Decision facts

  • GPT-4o-mini is #216; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini is #64 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 1.1 for GPT-4o-mini and 41.5 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.60 for GPT-4o-mini and $2.00 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini.
  • Published context is 128,000 tokens for GPT-4o-mini and 400,000 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini.
  • ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for GPT-4o-mini and 1 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.