Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507
Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 9:50:24 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | GPT-4o (2024-08-06) OpenAI | |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #128 | #124 |
| Index score | 30.8 | 32.4 |
| Evidence | Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards | Estimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 180 held-out anchors (18%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 9 rows (82%); exceeds every named peer on 7 of 9 rows; no cross-lab optimism probe available; shrunk 4.1 up toward the measured corpus |
| Input / 1M | $2.50 | Unavailable |
| Output / 1M | $10.00 | Unavailable |
| Pricing status | fresh | unavailable |
| Context | 128K | 262K |
| Providers | 2 | 0 |
| Weight access | API only | Open weights |
Decision facts
- GPT-4o (2024-08-06) is #128; Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 is #124 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 30.8 for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and 32.4 for Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: GPT-4o (2024-08-06) is Measured; Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 is Estimated.
- Published context is 128,000 tokens for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and 262,144 for Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507.
- Weight access differs: GPT-4o (2024-08-06) is none; Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507 is open.
- ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and 0 for Qwen3 4B Instruct 2507.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#4 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#4 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.6#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Grok 4.6#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.6#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Grok 4.6#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#6 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok 4.6#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#4 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs Grok 4.6#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#8 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#8 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.