Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct and GPT-5.2 Chat, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct vs GPT-5.2 Chat

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct and GPT-5.2 Chat
Field
ModelCap position#107#9
Index score22.574.9
EvidenceEstimatedpublisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibratedMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1M$1.50$1.75
Output / 1M$2.00$14.00
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context4K128K
Providers11
Weight accessAPI onlyAPI only

Decision facts

  • GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct is #107; GPT-5.2 Chat is #9 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 22.5 for GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct and 74.9 for GPT-5.2 Chat.
  • Evidence differs: GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct is Estimated; GPT-5.2 Chat is Measured.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $2.00 for GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct and $14.00 for GPT-5.2 Chat.
  • Published context is 4,095 tokens for GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct and 128,000 for GPT-5.2 Chat.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.