Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B and gpt-oss-120b, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B vs gpt-oss-120b

Live dataset updated 9/13/2026, 2:40:29 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B and gpt-oss-120b
Field
ModelCap position#123#124
Index score36.336.2
EvidenceEstimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 186 held-out anchors (58%); launch card against 3 resolved peers on 11 rows (42%); exceeds every named peer on 3 of 11 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 3.3 up toward the measured corpusMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.037
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.17
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—131K
Providers019
Weight accessRestricted licenseOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B is #123; gpt-oss-120b is #124 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 36.3 for Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B and 36.2 for gpt-oss-120b. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B is Estimated; gpt-oss-120b is Measured.
  • Weight access differs: Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B is restricted; gpt-oss-120b is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B and 19 for gpt-oss-120b.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.