Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B and GPT-4o-mini, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B vs GPT-4o-mini
Live dataset updated 9/13/2026, 2:40:29 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | GPT-4o-mini OpenAI | |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #123 | #126 |
| Index score | 36.3 | 35.4 |
| Evidence | Estimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 186 held-out anchors (58%); launch card against 3 resolved peers on 11 rows (42%); exceeds every named peer on 3 of 11 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 3.3 up toward the measured corpus | Measuredpublisher-corpus-prior over 186 held-out anchors (61%); 1 specialist-board observation at 2.1% support (39%); shrunk 21.8 up toward the measured corpus |
| Input / 1M | Unavailable | $0.15 |
| Output / 1M | Unavailable | $0.60 |
| Pricing status | unavailable | fresh |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Providers | 0 | 2 |
| Weight access | Restricted license | API only |
Decision facts
- Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B is #123; GPT-4o-mini is #126 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 36.3 for Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B and 35.4 for GPT-4o-mini. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B is Estimated; GPT-4o-mini is Measured.
- Weight access differs: Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B is restricted; GPT-4o-mini is none.
- ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for Nemotron Cascade 2 30B A3B and 2 for GPT-4o-mini.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#5 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5.3#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GLM 5.3#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GLM 5.3#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs GLM 5.3#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM 5.3#5 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#7 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM 5.3#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.