Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3 30B A3B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 3:06:08 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Kimi K2.7 Code and Qwen3 30B A3B
Field
Kimi K2.7 Code

Moonshot AI

ModelCap position#30#111
Index score62.224.0
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1M$0.66$0.12
Output / 1M$3.40$0.50
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K131K
Providers152
Weight accessRestricted licenseOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Kimi K2.7 Code is #30; Qwen3 30B A3B is #111 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 62.2 for Kimi K2.7 Code and 24.0 for Qwen3 30B A3B.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $3.40 for Kimi K2.7 Code and $0.50 for Qwen3 30B A3B.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Kimi K2.7 Code and 131,072 for Qwen3 30B A3B.
  • Weight access differs: Kimi K2.7 Code is restricted; Qwen3 30B A3B is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 15 providers for Kimi K2.7 Code and 2 for Qwen3 30B A3B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.