Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Kimi K2.7 Code and GPT-5.6 Luna, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Kimi K2.7 Code vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Kimi K2.7 Code and GPT-5.6 Luna
Field
Kimi K2.7 Code

Moonshot AI

ModelCap position#26#17
Index score63.268.0
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsMeasured6 public benchmark observations across 6 boards
Input / 1M$0.71$0.20
Output / 1M$3.50$1.20
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K1M
Providers143
Weight accessRestricted licenseAPI only

Decision facts

  • Kimi K2.7 Code is #26; GPT-5.6 Luna is #17 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 63.2 for Kimi K2.7 Code and 68.0 for GPT-5.6 Luna.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $3.50 for Kimi K2.7 Code and $1.20 for GPT-5.6 Luna.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Kimi K2.7 Code and 1,050,000 for GPT-5.6 Luna.
  • Weight access differs: Kimi K2.7 Code is restricted; GPT-5.6 Luna is none.
  • ModelCap currently lists 14 providers for Kimi K2.7 Code and 3 for GPT-5.6 Luna.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.