Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Live dataset updated 8/18/2026, 3:36:20 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Mistral Medium 3.5 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Field
ModelCap position#38#27
Index score53.962.3
EvidenceMeasured4 public benchmark observations across 4 boardsMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1M$1.50$0.39
Output / 1M$7.50$2.34
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K262K
Providers111
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Mistral Medium 3.5 is #38; Qwen3.5 397B A17B is #27 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 53.9 for Mistral Medium 3.5 and 62.3 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5 and $2.34 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Mistral Medium 3.5 and 262,144 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B.
  • Weight access differs: Mistral Medium 3.5 is none; Qwen3.5 397B A17B is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Mistral Medium 3.5 and 11 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.