Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with MiniMax M1 80k and Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

MiniMax M1 80k vs Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 9:50:24 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of MiniMax M1 80k and Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B
Field
ModelCap position#70#84
Index score52.148.0
EvidenceEstimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 180 held-out anchors (20%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 9 rows (81%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 9 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 0.5 up toward the measured corpusInheritedfinetune of qwen/qwen3.5-35b-a3b · finetune (100%)
Input / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Output / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Pricing statusunavailableunavailable
Context1M—
Providers00
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license

Decision facts

  • MiniMax M1 80k is #70; Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B is #84 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 52.1 for MiniMax M1 80k and 48.0 for Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: MiniMax M1 80k is Estimated; Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B is Inherited.
  • Weight access differs: MiniMax M1 80k is open; Ising Calibration 1 35B A3B is restricted.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.