Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with MiniMax-01 and Mistral Small 3.2 24B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
MiniMax-01 vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B
Live dataset updated 9/22/2026, 10:37:09 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | MiniMax-01 MiniMax | Mistral Small 3.2 24B Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #134 | #133 |
| Index score | 41.2 | 41.9 |
| Evidence | Estimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 209 held-out anchors (44%); launch card against 2 resolved peers on 4 rows (56%); optimism haircut 6.45 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 8.3 up toward the measured corpus | Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards |
| Input / 1M | $0.20 | $0.094 |
| Output / 1M | $1.10 | $0.25 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 1M | 256K |
| Providers | 1 | 3 |
| Weight access | License unverified | Open weights |
Decision facts
- MiniMax-01 is #134; Mistral Small 3.2 24B is #133 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 41.2 for MiniMax-01 and 41.9 for Mistral Small 3.2 24B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: MiniMax-01 is Estimated; Mistral Small 3.2 24B is Measured.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $1.10 for MiniMax-01 and $0.25 for Mistral Small 3.2 24B. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.95 for MiniMax-01 versus $0.31 for Mistral Small 3.2 24B. Mistral Small 3.2 24B costs 67.1% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 1,000,192 tokens for MiniMax-01 and 256,000 for Mistral Small 3.2 24B.
- Weight access differs: MiniMax-01 is unknown; Mistral Small 3.2 24B is open.
- ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for MiniMax-01 and 3 for Mistral Small 3.2 24B.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Sol#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.7#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Sol vs Grok 4.7#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.7#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Sol vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs Grok 4.7#6 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Qwen3.8 Max (0902) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs GPT-6 Sol#7 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.7#7 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Sol#8 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.