Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Mage VL and Phi 3.5 mini instruct, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Mage VL vs Phi 3.5 mini instruct

Live dataset updated 8/18/2026, 3:36:20 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Mage VL and Phi 3.5 mini instruct
Field
Mage VL

Microsoft

ModelCap position#152#200
Index score21.48.8
EvidenceEstimatedglobal corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibratedEstimatedstart rank interpolated from the launch card's own comparison table against resolved catalogue peers, discounted for measured cross-lab optimism
Input / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Output / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Pricing statusunavailableunavailable
Context——
Providers00
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Mage VL is #152; Phi 3.5 mini instruct is #200 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 21.4 for Mage VL and 8.8 for Phi 3.5 mini instruct.
  • Both positions use Estimated evidence.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.