Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Fara1.5 9B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Fara1.5 9B vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 9:50:24 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Fara1.5 9B and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Field
Fara1.5 9B

Microsoft

ModelCap position#101#98
Index score41.041.4
EvidenceInheritedfinetune of qwen/qwen3.5-9b · finetune (100%)Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.15
Output / 1MUnavailable$1.20
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—262K
Providers02
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Fara1.5 9B is #101; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is #98 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 41.0 for Fara1.5 9B and 41.4 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: Fara1.5 9B is Inherited; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is Measured.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for Fara1.5 9B and 2 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.