Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Fara1.5 27B and Qwen3.8 Flash, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Fara1.5 27B vs Qwen3.8 Flash
Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 9:50:24 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Fara1.5 27B Microsoft | Qwen3.8 Flash Qwen |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #69 | #62 |
| Index score | 52.3 | 54.1 |
| Evidence | Inheritedfinetune of qwen/qwen3.5-27b · finetune (100%) | Estimatedpublisher-corpus-prior over 180 held-out anchors (18%); measured predecessor qwen/qwen3.5-flash-02-23 less the succession penalty (65%); launch card against 4 resolved peers on 9 rows (17%); exceeds every named peer on 7 of 9 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 0.7 toward the measured corpus |
| Input / 1M | Unavailable | $0.15 |
| Output / 1M | Unavailable | $0.47 |
| Pricing status | unavailable | fresh |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Providers | 0 | 2 |
| Weight access | Open weights | Restricted license |
Decision facts
- Fara1.5 27B is #69; Qwen3.8 Flash is #62 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 52.3 for Fara1.5 27B and 54.1 for Qwen3.8 Flash. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: Fara1.5 27B is Inherited; Qwen3.8 Flash is Estimated.
- Weight access differs: Fara1.5 27B is open; Qwen3.8 Flash is restricted.
- ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for Fara1.5 27B and 2 for Qwen3.8 Flash.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#4 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#4 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.6#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Grok 4.6#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.6#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Grok 4.6#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#6 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok 4.6#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#4 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs Grok 4.6#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#8 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#8 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.