Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Muse Glimmer 30B and Qwen AgentWorld 35B A3B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen AgentWorld 35B A3B

Live dataset updated 8/18/2026, 3:36:20 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Muse Glimmer 30B and Qwen AgentWorld 35B A3B
Field
ModelCap position#190#96
Index score15.123.7
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardEstimatedpublisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated
Input / 1M$0.35Unavailable
Output / 1M$1.50Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context131K—
Providers40
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Muse Glimmer 30B is #190; Qwen AgentWorld 35B A3B is #96 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 15.1 for Muse Glimmer 30B and 23.7 for Qwen AgentWorld 35B A3B.
  • Evidence differs: Muse Glimmer 30B is Measured; Qwen AgentWorld 35B A3B is Estimated.
  • ModelCap currently lists 4 providers for Muse Glimmer 30B and 0 for Qwen AgentWorld 35B A3B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.