Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Muse Glimmer 30B and o3, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Muse Glimmer 30B vs o3

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Muse Glimmer 30B and o3
Field
o3

OpenAI

ModelCap position#36#38
Index score57.055.1
EvidenceEstimatedstart rank interpolated from the launch card's own comparison table against resolved catalogue peers, discounted for measured cross-lab optimismMeasured4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards
Input / 1M$0.35$2.00
Output / 1M$1.50$8.00
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context131K200K
Providers41
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only

Decision facts

  • Muse Glimmer 30B is #36; o3 is #38 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 57.0 for Muse Glimmer 30B and 55.1 for o3.
  • Evidence differs: Muse Glimmer 30B is Estimated; o3 is Measured.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $1.50 for Muse Glimmer 30B and $8.00 for o3.
  • Published context is 131,072 tokens for Muse Glimmer 30B and 200,000 for o3.
  • Weight access differs: Muse Glimmer 30B is open; o3 is none.
  • ModelCap currently lists 4 providers for Muse Glimmer 30B and 1 for o3.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.