Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Llama Guard 4 12B and GPT-4o-mini, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Llama Guard 4 12B vs GPT-4o-mini

Live dataset updated 8/18/2026, 3:36:20 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Llama Guard 4 12B and GPT-4o-mini
Field
ModelCap position#232#219
Index score0.01.1
EvidenceEstimatedpublisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibratedMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1M$0.18$0.15
Output / 1M$0.18$0.60
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context1M128K
Providers22
Weight accessGated accessAPI only

Decision facts

  • Llama Guard 4 12B is #232; GPT-4o-mini is #219 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 0.0 for Llama Guard 4 12B and 1.1 for GPT-4o-mini.
  • Evidence differs: Llama Guard 4 12B is Estimated; GPT-4o-mini is Measured.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.18 for Llama Guard 4 12B and $0.60 for GPT-4o-mini.
  • Published context is 1,048,576 tokens for Llama Guard 4 12B and 128,000 for GPT-4o-mini.
  • Weight access differs: Llama Guard 4 12B is gated; GPT-4o-mini is none.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.