Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 30B A3B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3 30B A3B
Field
ModelCap position#92#93
Index score25.324.6
EvidenceMeasured4 public benchmark observations across 4 boardsMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1M$0.20$0.13
Output / 1M$0.80$0.52
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context1M131K
Providers52
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Llama 4 Maverick is #92; Qwen3 30B A3B is #93 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 25.3 for Llama 4 Maverick and 24.6 for Qwen3 30B A3B.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.80 for Llama 4 Maverick and $0.52 for Qwen3 30B A3B.
  • Published context is 1,048,576 tokens for Llama 4 Maverick and 131,072 for Qwen3 30B A3B.
  • Weight access differs: Llama 4 Maverick is gated; Qwen3 30B A3B is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 5 providers for Llama 4 Maverick and 2 for Qwen3 30B A3B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.