Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and MiniMax M1 80k, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs MiniMax M1 80k

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and MiniMax M1 80k
Field
ModelCap position#174#171
Index score20.622.0
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M$0.10Unavailable
Output / 1M$0.32Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context131K1M
Providers120
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is #174; MiniMax M1 80k is #171 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 20.6 for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and 22.0 for MiniMax M1 80k.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Published context is 131,072 tokens for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and 1,000,000 for MiniMax M1 80k.
  • Weight access differs: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is gated; MiniMax M1 80k is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 12 providers for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and 0 for MiniMax M1 80k.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.