Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and GPT-4o-mini, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs GPT-4o-mini

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and GPT-4o-mini
Field
ModelCap position#218#216
Index score0.01.1
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1M$0.027$0.15
Output / 1M$0.201$0.60
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context60K128K
Providers12
Weight accessGated accessAPI only

Decision facts

  • Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is #218; GPT-4o-mini is #216 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 0.0 for Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and 1.1 for GPT-4o-mini.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.20 for Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and $0.60 for GPT-4o-mini.
  • Published context is 60,000 tokens for Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and 128,000 for GPT-4o-mini.
  • Weight access differs: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is gated; GPT-4o-mini is none.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and 2 for GPT-4o-mini.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.