Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with LongCat 2.0 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of LongCat 2.0 and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Field
ModelCap position#50#49
Index score48.550.4
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1M$0.30$0.09
Output / 1M$1.20$0.55
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context1M262K
Providers19
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • LongCat 2.0 is #50; Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 is #49 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 48.5 for LongCat 2.0 and 50.4 for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $1.20 for LongCat 2.0 and $0.55 for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507.
  • Published context is 1,048,756 tokens for LongCat 2.0 and 262,144 for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for LongCat 2.0 and 9 for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.