Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Ring-2.6-1T and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Ring-2.6-1T vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Ring-2.6-1T and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Field
Ring-2.6-1T

InclusionAI

ModelCap position#61#64
Index score42.541.5
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M$0.075$0.25
Output / 1M$0.625$2.00
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K400K
Providers11
Weight accessAPI onlyAPI only

Decision facts

  • Ring-2.6-1T is #61; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini is #64 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 42.5 for Ring-2.6-1T and 41.5 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.63 for Ring-2.6-1T and $2.00 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Ring-2.6-1T and 400,000 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.