Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Ling 3.0 tiny and ContextPilot E4B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Ling 3.0 tiny vs ContextPilot E4B

Live dataset updated 9/13/2026, 2:40:29 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Ling 3.0 tiny and ContextPilot E4B
Field
Ling 3.0 tiny

InclusionAI

ModelCap position#104#106
Index score41.941.3
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardInheritedfinetune of google/gemma-4-E4B-it · finetune (100%)
Input / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Output / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Pricing statusunavailableunavailable
Context
Providers00
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license

Decision facts

  • Ling 3.0 tiny is #104; ContextPilot E4B is #106 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 41.9 for Ling 3.0 tiny and 41.3 for ContextPilot E4B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: Ling 3.0 tiny is Measured; ContextPilot E4B is Inherited.
  • Weight access differs: Ling 3.0 tiny is open; ContextPilot E4B is restricted.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.