Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Ling 3.0 tiny and Qwen3 Max Thinking, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Ling 3.0 tiny vs Qwen3 Max Thinking

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 3:06:08 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Ling 3.0 tiny and Qwen3 Max Thinking
Field
Ling 3.0 tiny

InclusionAI

ModelCap position#83#64
Index score31.942.3
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.78
Output / 1MUnavailable$3.90
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—262K
Providers01
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only

Decision facts

  • Ling 3.0 tiny is #83; Qwen3 Max Thinking is #64 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 31.9 for Ling 3.0 tiny and 42.3 for Qwen3 Max Thinking.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Weight access differs: Ling 3.0 tiny is open; Qwen3 Max Thinking is none.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for Ling 3.0 tiny and 1 for Qwen3 Max Thinking.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.