Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Ling 3.0 tiny and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Ling 3.0 tiny vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 3:06:08 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Ling 3.0 tiny and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Field
Ling 3.0 tiny

InclusionAI

ModelCap position#83#69
Index score31.940.2
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.25
Output / 1MUnavailable$2.00
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context400K
Providers01
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only

Decision facts

  • Ling 3.0 tiny is #83; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini is #69 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 31.9 for Ling 3.0 tiny and 40.2 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Weight access differs: Ling 3.0 tiny is open; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini is none.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for Ling 3.0 tiny and 1 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.