Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and MiniMax M1 80k, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs MiniMax M1 80k
Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 9:50:24 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Ling 3.0 Flash Fin InclusionAI | MiniMax M1 80k MiniMaxAI |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #85 | #70 |
| Index score | 47.2 | 52.1 |
| Evidence | Inheritedfinetune of inclusionai/ling-3.0-flash · finetune (100%) | Estimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 180 held-out anchors (20%); launch card against 5 resolved peers on 9 rows (81%); exceeds every named peer on 1 of 9 rows; optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 0.5 up toward the measured corpus |
| Input / 1M | $0.06 | Unavailable |
| Output / 1M | $0.18 | Unavailable |
| Pricing status | fresh | unavailable |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Providers | 1 | 0 |
| Weight access | Open weights | Open weights |
Decision facts
- Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is #85; MiniMax M1 80k is #70 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 47.2 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and 52.1 for MiniMax M1 80k. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is Inherited; MiniMax M1 80k is Estimated.
- Published context is 262,144 tokens for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and 1,000,000 for MiniMax M1 80k.
- ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and 0 for MiniMax M1 80k.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#4 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#4 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs Grok 4.6#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Grok 4.6#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Grok 4.6#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Grok 4.6#4 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#6 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs Grok 4.6#6 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#4 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs Grok 4.6#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#8 vs #1 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#8 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.