Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Ling-3.0-flash and UI Mate 27B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Ling-3.0-flash vs UI Mate 27B

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 3:06:08 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Ling-3.0-flash and UI Mate 27B
Field
Ling-3.0-flash

InclusionAI

ModelCap position#49#52
Index score51.748.8
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardInheritedfinetune · finetune
Input / 1M$0.021Unavailable
Output / 1M$0.063Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context262K
Providers20
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Ling-3.0-flash is #49; UI Mate 27B is #52 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 51.7 for Ling-3.0-flash and 48.8 for UI Mate 27B.
  • Evidence differs: Ling-3.0-flash is Measured; UI Mate 27B is Inherited.
  • ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for Ling-3.0-flash and 0 for UI Mate 27B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.