Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Ling-3.0-flash and GPT-5.5 Pro, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Ling-3.0-flash vs GPT-5.5 Pro

Live dataset updated 8/18/2026, 3:36:20 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Ling-3.0-flash and GPT-5.5 Pro
Field
Ling-3.0-flash

InclusionAI

ModelCap position#41#76
Index score53.035.8
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M$0.021$30.00
Output / 1M$0.063$180
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K1M
Providers21
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only

Decision facts

  • Ling-3.0-flash is #41; GPT-5.5 Pro is #76 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 53.0 for Ling-3.0-flash and 35.8 for GPT-5.5 Pro.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.06 for Ling-3.0-flash and $180.00 for GPT-5.5 Pro.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Ling-3.0-flash and 1,050,000 for GPT-5.5 Pro.
  • Weight access differs: Ling-3.0-flash is open; GPT-5.5 Pro is none.
  • ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for Ling-3.0-flash and 1 for GPT-5.5 Pro.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.