Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Ling-3.0-flash and Nemotron 3 Ultra, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Ling-3.0-flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:24:34 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Ling-3.0-flash and Nemotron 3 Ultra
Field
Ling-3.0-flash

InclusionAI

ModelCap position#42#43
Index score53.052.9
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1M$0.021$0.60
Output / 1M$0.063$3.60
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K512K
Providers24
Weight accessOpen weightsRestricted license

Decision facts

  • Ling-3.0-flash is #42; Nemotron 3 Ultra is #43 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 53.0 for Ling-3.0-flash and 52.9 for Nemotron 3 Ultra.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.06 for Ling-3.0-flash and $3.60 for Nemotron 3 Ultra.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Ling-3.0-flash and 512,288 for Nemotron 3 Ultra.
  • Weight access differs: Ling-3.0-flash is open; Nemotron 3 Ultra is restricted.
  • ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for Ling-3.0-flash and 4 for Nemotron 3 Ultra.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.