Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Ling-3.0-flash and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Ling-3.0-flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 2:54:47 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Ling-3.0-flash and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Field
Ling-3.0-flash

InclusionAI

ModelCap position#49#101
Index score51.724.7
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardEstimatedpublisher corpus prior · leave-one-anchor-out calibrated
Input / 1M$0.021Free
Output / 1M$0.063Free
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K262K
Providers21
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only

Decision facts

  • Ling-3.0-flash is #49; Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is #101 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 51.7 for Ling-3.0-flash and 24.7 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.
  • Evidence differs: Ling-3.0-flash is Measured; Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is Estimated.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.06 for Ling-3.0-flash and $0 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Ling-3.0-flash and 262,144 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.
  • Weight access differs: Ling-3.0-flash is open; Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is none.
  • ModelCap currently lists 2 providers for Ling-3.0-flash and 1 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.