Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Ling-2.6-1T and Ling-3.0-flash, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Ling-2.6-1T vs Ling-3.0-flash

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Ling-2.6-1T and Ling-3.0-flash
Field
Ling-2.6-1T

InclusionAI

Ling-3.0-flash

InclusionAI

ModelCap position#74#42
Index score36.053.0
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M$0.075$0.021
Output / 1M$0.625$0.063
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K262K
Providers12
Weight accessAPI onlyOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Ling-2.6-1T is #74; Ling-3.0-flash is #42 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 36.0 for Ling-2.6-1T and 53.0 for Ling-3.0-flash.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.63 for Ling-2.6-1T and $0.06 for Ling-3.0-flash.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Ling-2.6-1T and 262,144 for Ling-3.0-flash.
  • Weight access differs: Ling-2.6-1T is none; Ling-3.0-flash is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Ling-2.6-1T and 2 for Ling-3.0-flash.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.