Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Mercury 2.5 and Nemotron 3 Super, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Mercury 2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super
Live dataset updated 9/13/2026, 2:40:29 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Mercury 2.5 Inception Labs | Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #121 | #118 |
| Index score | 37.3 | 37.7 |
| Evidence | Estimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 186 held-out anchors (23%); opens from measured predecessor inception/mercury-2 (77%); shrunk 4.4 up toward the measured corpus | Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards |
| Input / 1M | $0.04 | $0.085 |
| Output / 1M | $0.15 | $0.40 |
| Pricing status | fresh | fresh |
| Context | 260K | 262K |
| Providers | 1 | 2 |
| Weight access | API only | Restricted license |
Decision facts
- Mercury 2.5 is #121; Nemotron 3 Super is #118 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 37.3 for Mercury 2.5 and 37.7 for Nemotron 3 Super. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Evidence differs: Mercury 2.5 is Estimated; Nemotron 3 Super is Measured.
- Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.15 for Mercury 2.5 and $0.40 for Nemotron 3 Super. For 1,000 requests with 2,000 input and 500 output tokens each (2M input + 0.5M output), the listed-rate estimate is $0.15 for Mercury 2.5 versus $0.37 for Nemotron 3 Super. Mercury 2.5 costs 58.1% less in this scenario. This excludes caching, batch discounts, prompt-length tiers, tool charges and retries; verify the selected endpoint before budgeting.
- Published context is 260,000 tokens for Mercury 2.5 and 262,144 for Nemotron 3 Super.
- Weight access differs: Mercury 2.5 is none; Nemotron 3 Super is restricted.
- ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Mercury 2.5 and 2 for Nemotron 3 Super.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#5 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5.3#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GLM 5.3#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GLM 5.3#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs GLM 5.3#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM 5.3#5 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#7 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM 5.3#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.