Model decision surface
Compare AI models
Start with Mercury 2.5 and EXAONE 4.0.1 32B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.
Current public data
Mercury 2.5 vs EXAONE 4.0.1 32B
Live dataset updated 9/13/2026, 2:40:29 PM UTC
Open 1200×630 evidence receipt| Field | Mercury 2.5 Inception Labs | EXAONE 4.0.1 32B LGAI EXAONE |
|---|---|---|
| ModelCap position | #121 | #122 |
| Index score | 37.3 | 36.9 |
| Evidence | Estimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 186 held-out anchors (23%); opens from measured predecessor inception/mercury-2 (77%); shrunk 4.4 up toward the measured corpus | Estimatedglobal-corpus-prior over 186 held-out anchors (9%); launch card against 7 resolved peers on 8 rows (91%); optimism haircut 0 from cross-lab-probe; shrunk 1.5 up toward the measured corpus |
| Input / 1M | $0.04 | Unavailable |
| Output / 1M | $0.15 | Unavailable |
| Pricing status | fresh | unavailable |
| Context | 260K | — |
| Providers | 1 | 0 |
| Weight access | API only | Restricted license |
Decision facts
- Mercury 2.5 is #121; EXAONE 4.0.1 32B is #122 on the same current language board.
- Index scores are 37.3 for Mercury 2.5 and 36.9 for EXAONE 4.0.1 32B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
- Both positions use Estimated evidence.
- Weight access differs: Mercury 2.5 is none; EXAONE 4.0.1 32B is restricted.
- ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Mercury 2.5 and 0 for EXAONE 4.0.1 32B.
These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.
Popular comparisons
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3#1 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5#1 vs #3 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Muse Spark 1.3#3 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra#1 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Astra#2 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-6 Astra#3 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#1 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#2 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol#3 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra#5 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GLM 5.3#1 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs GLM 5.3#2 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs GLM 5.3#3 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-6 Astra vs GLM 5.3#4 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- GPT-5.6 Sol vs GLM 5.3#5 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#1 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3#7 vs #2 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash#3 vs #7 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra#7 vs #4 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-5.6 Sol#7 vs #5 on the ModelCap Index
- Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GLM 5.3#7 vs #6 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3#1 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Muse Spark 1.3 vs Kimi K3#2 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
- Claude Opus 5 vs Kimi K3#3 vs #8 on the ModelCap Index
Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.