Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with granite 4.2 3b and Qwen3 30B A3B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

granite 4.2 3b vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 9:50:24 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of granite 4.2 3b and Qwen3 30B A3B
Field
granite 4.2 3b

IBM Granite

ModelCap position#134#132
Index score26.128.3
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.12
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.50
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context131K131K
Providers02
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • granite 4.2 3b is #134; Qwen3 30B A3B is #132 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 26.1 for granite 4.2 3b and 28.3 for Qwen3 30B A3B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Published context is 131,072 tokens for granite 4.2 3b and 131,072 for Qwen3 30B A3B.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for granite 4.2 3b and 2 for Qwen3 30B A3B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.