Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with granite 4.2 3b and gpt-oss-safeguard-20b, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

granite 4.2 3b vs gpt-oss-safeguard-20b

Live dataset updated 9/9/2026, 9:50:24 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of granite 4.2 3b and gpt-oss-safeguard-20b
Field
granite 4.2 3b

IBM Granite

ModelCap position#134#137
Index score26.124.5
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsInheritedfinetune of openai/gpt-oss-20b · fp4 (100%)
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.075
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.30
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context131K131K
Providers01
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • granite 4.2 3b is #134; gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is #137 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 26.1 for granite 4.2 3b and 24.5 for gpt-oss-safeguard-20b. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: granite 4.2 3b is Measured; gpt-oss-safeguard-20b is Inherited.
  • Published context is 131,072 tokens for granite 4.2 3b and 131,072 for gpt-oss-safeguard-20b.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for granite 4.2 3b and 1 for gpt-oss-safeguard-20b.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.