Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with granite 4.2 30b and Ling 3.0 tiny, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

granite 4.2 30b vs Ling 3.0 tiny

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 2:54:47 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of granite 4.2 30b and Ling 3.0 tiny
Field
granite 4.2 30b

IBM Granite

Ling 3.0 tiny

InclusionAI

ModelCap position#86#83
Index score30.431.9
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Output / 1MUnavailableUnavailable
Pricing statusunavailableunavailable
Context131K—
Providers00
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • granite 4.2 30b is #86; Ling 3.0 tiny is #83 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 30.4 for granite 4.2 30b and 31.9 for Ling 3.0 tiny.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.