Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Granite 4.0 Micro and Saba, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Granite 4.0 Micro vs Saba

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Granite 4.0 Micro and Saba
Field
Saba

Mistral AI

ModelCap position#221#222
Index score0.00.0
EvidenceMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 boardMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M$0.017$0.20
Output / 1M$0.112$0.60
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context131K33K
Providers11
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only

Decision facts

  • Granite 4.0 Micro is #221; Saba is #222 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 0.0 for Granite 4.0 Micro and 0.0 for Saba.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.11 for Granite 4.0 Micro and $0.60 for Saba.
  • Published context is 131,000 tokens for Granite 4.0 Micro and 32,768 for Saba.
  • Weight access differs: Granite 4.0 Micro is open; Saba is none.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.