Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 4 31B and Mistral Medium 3.5, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 4 31B vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Live dataset updated 8/18/2026, 3:36:20 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 4 31B and Mistral Medium 3.5
Field
ModelCap position#30#38
Index score60.053.9
EvidenceMeasured5 public benchmark observations across 5 boardsMeasured4 public benchmark observations across 4 boards
Input / 1M$0.10$1.50
Output / 1M$0.34$7.50
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K262K
Providers161
Weight accessOpen weightsAPI only

Decision facts

  • Gemma 4 31B is #30; Mistral Medium 3.5 is #38 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 60.0 for Gemma 4 31B and 53.9 for Mistral Medium 3.5.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.34 for Gemma 4 31B and $7.50 for Mistral Medium 3.5.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Gemma 4 31B and 262,144 for Mistral Medium 3.5.
  • Weight access differs: Gemma 4 31B is open; Mistral Medium 3.5 is none.
  • ModelCap currently lists 16 providers for Gemma 4 31B and 1 for Mistral Medium 3.5.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.