Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 4 26B A4B and Muse Glimmer 30B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Muse Glimmer 30B

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 4 26B A4B and Muse Glimmer 30B
Field
ModelCap position#37#36
Index score56.557.0
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsEstimatedstart rank interpolated from the launch card's own comparison table against resolved catalogue peers, discounted for measured cross-lab optimism
Input / 1M$0.07$0.35
Output / 1M$0.34$1.50
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K131K
Providers84
Weight accessOpen weightsOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Gemma 4 26B A4B is #37; Muse Glimmer 30B is #36 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 56.5 for Gemma 4 26B A4B and 57.0 for Muse Glimmer 30B.
  • Evidence differs: Gemma 4 26B A4B is Measured; Muse Glimmer 30B is Estimated.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.34 for Gemma 4 26B A4B and $1.50 for Muse Glimmer 30B.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Gemma 4 26B A4B and 131,072 for Muse Glimmer 30B.
  • ModelCap currently lists 8 providers for Gemma 4 26B A4B and 4 for Muse Glimmer 30B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.