Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with gemma 3n E4B it and GPT-4o-mini, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

gemma 3n E4B it vs GPT-4o-mini

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 3:06:08 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of gemma 3n E4B it and GPT-4o-mini
Field
ModelCap position#177#211
Index score19.30.0
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.15
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.60
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context33K128K
Providers02
Weight accessGated accessAPI only

Decision facts

  • gemma 3n E4B it is #177; GPT-4o-mini is #211 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 19.3 for gemma 3n E4B it and 0.0 for GPT-4o-mini.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Published context is 32,768 tokens for gemma 3n E4B it and 128,000 for GPT-4o-mini.
  • Weight access differs: gemma 3n E4B it is gated; GPT-4o-mini is none.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for gemma 3n E4B it and 2 for GPT-4o-mini.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.