Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 3n 4B and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 3n 4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 3n 4B and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Field
ModelCap position#179#181
Index score20.418.9
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1M$0.06$0.05
Output / 1M$0.12$0.20
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context33K262K
Providers13
Weight accessGated accessRestricted license

Decision facts

  • Gemma 3n 4B is #179; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is #181 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 20.4 for Gemma 3n 4B and 18.9 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.12 for Gemma 3n 4B and $0.20 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.
  • Published context is 32,768 tokens for Gemma 3n 4B and 262,144 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.
  • Weight access differs: Gemma 3n 4B is gated; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is restricted.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Gemma 3n 4B and 3 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.