Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 3n 4B and Granite 4.1 8B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 3n 4B vs Granite 4.1 8B

Live dataset updated 8/18/2026, 3:36:20 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 3n 4B and Granite 4.1 8B
Field
Granite 4.1 8B

IBM Granite

ModelCap position#176#189
Index score20.415.1
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1M$0.06$0.05
Output / 1M$0.12$0.10
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context33K131K
Providers11
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Gemma 3n 4B is #176; Granite 4.1 8B is #189 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 20.4 for Gemma 3n 4B and 15.1 for Granite 4.1 8B.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.12 for Gemma 3n 4B and $0.10 for Granite 4.1 8B.
  • Published context is 32,768 tokens for Gemma 3n 4B and 131,072 for Granite 4.1 8B.
  • Weight access differs: Gemma 3n 4B is gated; Granite 4.1 8B is open.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.