Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with gemma 3n E2B it and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

gemma 3n E2B it vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Live dataset updated 9/13/2026, 2:40:29 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of gemma 3n E2B it and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Field
ModelCap position#162#159
Index score22.524.1
EvidenceInheritedfinetune of google/gemma-3n-E4B-it · finetune (100%)Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.05
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.20
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—262K
Providers04
Weight accessGated accessRestricted license

Decision facts

  • gemma 3n E2B it is #162; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is #159 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 22.5 for gemma 3n E2B it and 24.1 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: gemma 3n E2B it is Inherited; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is Measured.
  • Weight access differs: gemma 3n E2B it is gated; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is restricted.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for gemma 3n E2B it and 4 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.