Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with gemma 3n E2B it and Gemma 4 31B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

gemma 3n E2B it vs Gemma 4 31B

Live dataset updated 9/13/2026, 2:40:29 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of gemma 3n E2B it and Gemma 4 31B
Field
ModelCap position#162#27
Index score22.568.9
EvidenceInheritedfinetune of google/gemma-3n-E4B-it · finetune (100%)Measured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.09
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.34
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—262K
Providers012
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • gemma 3n E2B it is #162; Gemma 4 31B is #27 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 22.5 for gemma 3n E2B it and 68.9 for Gemma 4 31B. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
  • Evidence differs: gemma 3n E2B it is Inherited; Gemma 4 31B is Measured.
  • Weight access differs: gemma 3n E2B it is gated; Gemma 4 31B is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for gemma 3n E2B it and 12 for Gemma 4 31B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.