Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with gemma 3n E2B it and Gemma 4 26B A4B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

gemma 3n E2B it vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

Live dataset updated 9/13/2026, 2:40:29 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of gemma 3n E2B it and Gemma 4 26B A4B
Field
ModelCap position#162#39
Index score22.564.5
EvidenceInheritedfinetune of google/gemma-3n-E4B-it · finetune (100%)Measured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boards
Input / 1MUnavailable$0.09
Output / 1MUnavailable$0.30
Pricing statusunavailablefresh
Context—262K
Providers011
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • gemma 3n E2B it is #162; Gemma 4 26B A4B is #39 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 22.5 for gemma 3n E2B it and 64.5 for Gemma 4 26B A4B. Their published uncertainty intervals do not overlap, but the aggregate Index does not predict performance on every task; compare the relevant benchmark configurations before choosing.
  • Evidence differs: gemma 3n E2B it is Inherited; Gemma 4 26B A4B is Measured.
  • Weight access differs: gemma 3n E2B it is gated; Gemma 4 26B A4B is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 0 providers for gemma 3n E2B it and 11 for Gemma 4 26B A4B.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.