Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 3 4B and gemma 3n E2B it, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 3 4B vs gemma 3n E2B it

Live dataset updated 9/13/2026, 2:40:29 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 3 4B and gemma 3n E2B it
Field
ModelCap position#165#162
Index score20.022.5
EvidenceMeasured2 public benchmark observations across 2 boardsInheritedfinetune of google/gemma-3n-E4B-it · finetune (100%)
Input / 1M$0.05Unavailable
Output / 1M$0.10Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context131K—
Providers10
Weight accessGated accessGated access

Decision facts

  • Gemma 3 4B is #165; gemma 3n E2B it is #162 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 20.0 for Gemma 3 4B and 22.5 for gemma 3n E2B it. Their published uncertainty intervals overlap, so the rank difference alone does not establish a reliable capability advantage for your workload.
  • Evidence differs: Gemma 3 4B is Measured; gemma 3n E2B it is Inherited.
  • ModelCap currently lists 1 providers for Gemma 3 4B and 0 for gemma 3n E2B it.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.