Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3 Coder Next, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 2:20:18 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3 Coder Next
Field
ModelCap position#90#91
Index score28.528.0
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M$0.08$0.12
Output / 1M$0.45$0.80
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context131K262K
Providers44
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Gemma 3 27B is #90; Qwen3 Coder Next is #91 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 28.5 for Gemma 3 27B and 28.0 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.45 for Gemma 3 27B and $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
  • Published context is 131,072 tokens for Gemma 3 27B and 262,144 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
  • Weight access differs: Gemma 3 27B is gated; Qwen3 Coder Next is open.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.