Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3.5-9B, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.5-9B

Live dataset updated 8/17/2026, 11:13:20 PM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3.5-9B
Field
ModelCap position#81#83
Index score29.928.6
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M$0.08$0.10
Output / 1M$0.45$0.15
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K262K
Providers55
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Gemma 3 27B is #81; Qwen3.5-9B is #83 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 29.9 for Gemma 3 27B and 28.6 for Qwen3.5-9B.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.45 for Gemma 3 27B and $0.15 for Qwen3.5-9B.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Gemma 3 27B and 262,144 for Qwen3.5-9B.
  • Weight access differs: Gemma 3 27B is gated; Qwen3.5-9B is open.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.