Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 3 27B and Nemotron 3 Super, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 3 27B vs Nemotron 3 Super

Live dataset updated 8/18/2026, 3:36:20 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 3 27B and Nemotron 3 Super
Field
ModelCap position#82#75
Index score29.835.8
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boards
Input / 1M$0.08$0.085
Output / 1M$0.45$0.40
Pricing statusfreshfresh
Context262K1M
Providers53
Weight accessGated accessRestricted license

Decision facts

  • Gemma 3 27B is #82; Nemotron 3 Super is #75 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 29.8 for Gemma 3 27B and 35.8 for Nemotron 3 Super.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Listed output price per 1M tokens is $0.45 for Gemma 3 27B and $0.40 for Nemotron 3 Super.
  • Published context is 262,144 tokens for Gemma 3 27B and 1,000,000 for Nemotron 3 Super.
  • Weight access differs: Gemma 3 27B is gated; Nemotron 3 Super is restricted.
  • ModelCap currently lists 5 providers for Gemma 3 27B and 3 for Nemotron 3 Super.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.