Skip to content
ModelCap

Model decision surface

Compare AI models

Start with Gemma 3 27B and MiniMax M1 80k, or choose any two current ranked language models. Compare capability evidence, price, context, provider availability, and weight access without pretending one field decides every use case.

Current public data

Gemma 3 27B vs MiniMax M1 80k

Live dataset updated 9/3/2026, 3:06:08 AM UTC

Open 1200×630 evidence receipt
Factual comparison of Gemma 3 27B and MiniMax M1 80k
Field
ModelCap position#90#171
Index score28.521.4
EvidenceMeasured3 public benchmark observations across 3 boardsMeasured1 public benchmark observation across 1 board
Input / 1M$0.08Unavailable
Output / 1M$0.45Unavailable
Pricing statusfreshunavailable
Context131K1M
Providers40
Weight accessGated accessOpen weights

Decision facts

  • Gemma 3 27B is #90; MiniMax M1 80k is #171 on the same current language board.
  • Index scores are 28.5 for Gemma 3 27B and 21.4 for MiniMax M1 80k.
  • Both positions use Measured evidence.
  • Published context is 131,072 tokens for Gemma 3 27B and 1,000,000 for MiniMax M1 80k.
  • Weight access differs: Gemma 3 27B is gated; MiniMax M1 80k is open.
  • ModelCap currently lists 4 providers for Gemma 3 27B and 0 for MiniMax M1 80k.

These are separate published fields, not a synthetic winner. ModelCap does not collapse price, access, context, and capability evidence into a hidden recommendation score.

Each comparison page is a permanent, shareable URL with the same live figures as this tool: ModelCap Index position, API pricing, context window, provider count, weight access and every shared benchmark board.